In the changing world with various customers’ demands the businesses tend to improve their advantages to beat their rivals by means of better quality, lower prices and so. For Iranian polyester market quality is of crucial importance and is achieved through changing and updating technologies. According to highly regarded model of CAPTECH, which is recommended by UNIDO, technology parameters are defined in each phase and not generally as a whole. In the end the biggest gaps are defined. The main goal is to prioritize the main parameters affecting Iranian polyester company's quality. In order to fulfill our goal, 20 high and medium managers were questioned for this paper. The questions were gathered according to UNIDO samples. After a qualitative and quantitative test we concluded that the biggest gap is for supply chain(56.91) and the lowest gap is for combination phase(43.97).

Ghasemi, E., Jamali, B & Nouri, P. (2012). Technology change priorities influencing competition quality promotion: Case study of Iran Keaton Polyester Manufacturing Company.Management Science Letters, 2(6), 1913-1920.

Chan, F.T.S, Chan, M.H., & Tang N.K.H. (2000). Evaluation methodologies for technology selection. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 107(1-3), 330-337.

Dupe, M. (1990). Technology and Science, Industry and Education. Australian govt. Pub Service.

Ellul, J. (1964). The Technological Society (J. Wilkinson, Trans.). New York: Knopf.

Hejazi, R., & Binesh, M. (2009).Technology evaluation in small to medium enterprises. Industrial management organization publications, Tehran, Iran.

Law, A., Ridway, K., & Atkinson, H. (2000). QFD in new production technology evaluation. International Journal of Production Economics, 67(2), 103-112.

Lee, A.H.I., Wang, W.M., & Lin, T.Y. (2010). An evaluation framework for technology transfer of new equipment in high technology industry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77(9), 1527-1539.

Moors, E. H.M. (2005). Technology strategies for sustainable metals production systems: a case study of primary aluminum production in the Netherlands and Norway. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14(12-13), 1121-1138.

Nasierowski, W. (1991). technology and quality improvements in Mexican companies: some international comparisons. Journal of Quality Management, 5(1), 119-137.

Nikula, U., Jurvanen, C., Gotel, O., & Gause, D.C. (2010). Empirical validation of the classic change curve on a software technology change project. Information and Software Technology, 52(6), 680-696.

Savioz, P., & Blum M. (2002). Strategic forecast tool for SMEs: How the opportunity landscape interacts with business strategy to anticipate technological trends, Technovation, 22(2), 91-100.

Sultan, S.S. (2007). Competitive Advantages of SMEs, the Case of Jordan’s Natural Stone Industry. Universitaire Pers Maastricht, ISBN 978 90 5278 642 1.

Vecchiato, R., & Roveda, C. (2010). Strategic foresight in corporate organizations: Handling the effect and response uncertainty of technology and social drivers of change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77(9), 1527-1539.