Performance measurement of employee using an integrated 360° feedback system and AHP method: A case study of municipality


Younos Vakil Alroaia and Zahra Najafi


Performance measurement plays an essential role on accelerating the efficiency of any organization. There are literally different methods for measuring the relative performance of a particular unit and many of them are involved considering various criteria. In this paper, we propose 360° feedback system for performance measurement of all employees who work for municipality of the city of Tabas located in east part of Iran. The proposed model of this paper also uses hierarchical method to cluster different attributes based on various characteristics and implements analytical hierarchy process to find the relative importance of all items. The survey uses five personal characteristics including cognitive, technical, personal and human skills and for each major item, the proposed model considers various sub-criteria. The results indicate that technical and cognitive skills are the most important personal characteristics followed by human and personal characteristics. The results of this survey show that responsibility and quality of work are the most important employee characteristics.


DOI: j.msl.2012.04.024

Keywords: 360° feedback system Customer Municipality ,Analytical hierarchy process ,AHP

How to cite this paper:

Alroaia, Y & Najafi, Z. (2012). Performance measurement of employee using an integrated 360° feedback system and AHP method: A case study of municipality.Management Science Letters, 2(5), 1655-1660.


References

Ahangari, S., & Amirzadeh, S. (2011). Exploring the Teachers’ Use of Spoken Corrective Feedback in Teaching Iranian EFL Learners at Different Levels of Proficiency. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 29, 1859-1868.

Antonioni, D., & Park, H. (2001). The relationship between rater affect and three sources of 360-degree feedback ratings. Journal of Management, 27(4), 479-495.

Atwater, L.E., & Brett, J.F. (2005). Antecedents and consequences of reactions to developmental 360° feedback. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66(3), 532-548.

Carson, M. (2006). Saying it like it isn't: The pros and cons of 360-degree feedback. Business Horizons, 49(5), 395-402.

Cohen, S., Doumpos, M., Neofytou, E., & Zopounidis,C. (2012). Assessing financial distress where bankruptcy is not an option: An alternative approach for local municipalities. European Journal of Operational Research, 218(1), 270-279.

Chen, C.C. (2010). A performance evaluation of MSW management practice in Taiwan. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 54(12), 1353-1361.

Facteau, C.L., Facteau, J.D., Schoel, L.C., Russell, J.E.A., & Poteet, M.L. (1998).Reactions of leaders to 360-degree feedback from subordinates and peers. The Leadership Quarterly, 9(4), 427-448.

Lin, M.I., Lee, Y.D., & Ho,T.N. (2011). Applying integrated DEA/AHP to evaluate the economic performance of local governments in China. European Journal of Operational Research, 209(2), 129-140.

Waldman, D.A., & Atwater, L.E. (1998). The Power of 360° Feedback. Elsevier.

Williams, J.R., & Lueke, S. B.(1999). 360° feedback system effectiveness: Test of a model in a field setting. Journal of Quality Management, 4(1), 23-49.

Wood, J., Collins, J., Burnside, E.S., Albanese, M.A., Propeck, P.A., Kelcz, F., Spilde, J.M., & Schmaltz, L.M. (2004). Patient, faculty, and self-assessment of radiology resident performance:: A 360-degree method of measuring professionalism and interpersonal/communication skills. Academic Radiology, 11(8), 931-939.

Zhang, X., Wu, Y., & Shen, L. (2011). An evaluation framework for the sustainability of urban land use: A study of capital cities and municipalities in China. Habitat International, 35(1), 141-149.



Corresponding author. Tel: +989122316247

E-mail addresses: younos.vakil@gmail.com (Y. VakilAlroaia)

© 2012 Growing Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

doi: 10.5267/j.msl.2012.04.024