Portfolio selection between rational and ehavioral theories mergent markets ase


Ezzeddine Ben Mohamed and Bouri Abdelfatteh


The aim of this paper is to explore the determinants of Portfolio Choice under the investors, professionals and academics’ perception. We introduce an approach based on cognitive mapping technique with a series of semi-directive interviews. Among a sample of 30 Tunisian individuals, we propose tow different frameworks: a mean-variance framework and a behavioral framework. Each framework is oriented to capture the effect of some concepts as proposed by the mean-variance portfolio theory and the behavioral portfolio theory on the portfolio choice decision. The originality of this research paper is guaranteed since it traits the behavioral portfolio choice in emergent markets. In the best of our knowledge this is the first study in the Tunisian context that explores such area of research.


DOI: j.msl.2012.02.015

Keywords: Mean-variance portfolio choice ,Behavioral portfolio choice ,Determinants of portfolio choice ,Cognitive maps

How to cite this paper:

Mohamed, E & Tunisia, B. (2012). Portfolio selection between rational and ehavioral theories mergent markets ase.Management Science Letters, 2(4), 1219-1232.


References

Arthur, P., & R. Passini, (1992). Way finding: people, signs and architecture. New York: Mac Graw-Hill Ryerson.

Axelord, R. (1976). Structure of Decision: the Cognitive Maps of Political Elites. Princeton University, NJ.

Bougon, M., Weick, K., & Binkhorst, D. (1977). Cognition in organization: an analysis of the Utrecht Jazz Orchestra. Administrative Science Quarterly. 22, 606-639.

Bueno, S., & Salmeron, J.L. (2009). Benchmarking main activation functions in fuzzy cognitive maps2. Expert Systems with Applicattions. 36, 5221-5229.

Eden, C., & Ackermann, F. (1998). Making Strategy. The journey of Strategic Management, SAGE Publications, London, UK, ISBN 0-7619-5525-X

Eden, C. (2004). Analyzing cognitive maps to help structure or problems. European Journal of Operational Research. 159, 673-686.

Kaheneman, D., Knetsch, J.L., & Thaler, R. (1991). Anomalies: The ndowment ffect, Loss version, and status quo ias. The Journal of Economic Perspectives. 5(1), 193-206.

Kahneman, D., & Teversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: Analysis Decision Making Under Risk. Econometrica. 47, 263-291.

Koulouriotis, D.E., Diakoulakis, I.E., Emiris, D.M., Antonidakis, E.N., & Kaliakatsos, I.A. (2003). Efficiently modeling and controlling complex dynamic systems using evolutionary fuzzy cognitive maps. International Journal of Computational Cognition. 1, 41-65.

Lopes, L. (1987). Between hope and ear: The psychology of risk. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. 20, 255-295.

Markowitz, H. M. (1959). Portfolio Selection: Diversification of Investments. New York: Jhon Wiley and Sons.

Markowitz, H. M. (1952). Portfolio Selection. Journal of Finance. 7, 77-91.

Prigent et al. (2008). Using cognitive maps to investigate fishers’ ecosystem objectives and knowledge. Ocean and Costal Management. 51, 450-462.

Sharlin et al. (2009). A tangible user interface for assessing cognitive mapping ability. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 67, 269-278.

Shefrin, H., & M. Statman, (2000). Behavioral portfolio theory. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analyses, 35, 127-151.

Statman, M. (2005). What Is Behavioral Finance?. An Interview With Meir Statman. Industry Trend. The Monitor.Thaler, R. (1985). Mental ccounting and onsumer hoice. Marketing Science. 4, 199-215.

Thaler, R. (1999). The nd of ehavioral inance. Financial Analysts Journal. 55, 12-17.

Tolman, E.C. (1948). Cognitive maps in rats and men. Psychological Review. 55, 189-208.

Von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1947). Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Weick, K.E., & Bougon, M.G. (1986). Organisation as cognitive maps: Charting ways to success and failure. The thinking organization: Dynamics of organizational social. San Francisco, Jossey Bass Publishers, 102-13