Volume 2 Issue 3 pp. 575-582 Summer, 2011


The impact of Weibull data and autocorrelation on the performance of the Shewhart and exponentially weighted moving average control charts


Gary Black, James Smith and Sabrina Wells


Many real-world processes generate autocorrelated and/or Weibull data. In such cases, the independence and/or normality assumptions underlying the Shewhart and EWMA control charts are invalid. Although data transformations exist, such tools would not normally be understood or employed by naive practitioners. Thus, the question arises, “What are the effects on robustness whenever these charts are used in such applications?” Consequently, this paper examines and compares the performance of these two control charts when the problem (the model) is subjected to autocorrelated and/or Weibull data. A variety of conditions are investigated related to the magnitudes of various parameters related to the process shift, the autocorrelation coefficient and the Weibull shape parameter. Results indicate that the EWMA chart outperforms the Shewhart in 62% of the cases, particularly those cases with low to moderate autocorrelation effects. The Shewhart chart outperforms the EWMA chart in 35% of the cases, particularly those cases with high autocorrelation and zero or high process shift effects.


DOI: 10.5267/j.ijiec.2011.03.002

Keywords: Statistical process control, Normality assumption, Independence assumption, Autocorrelation, Weibull
References

Alwan, L. C. (1992). Effects of autocorrelation on control chart performance. Communications in Statistics – Theory and Methods, 21(4), 1025-1049.

Alwan, L.C. & Bissell, M.G. (1988). Time-Series modeling for quality control in clinical chemistry, Clinical Chemistry, 34, 1396-1406.

Barr, T. J. (1993). Performance of quality control procedures when monitoring correlated processes, Ph.D. dissertation. Atlanta, GA: Georgia Institute of Technology.

Berthouex, P.M., Hunter, W.G. & Pallesen, L. (1978). Monitoring sewage treatment plants: some quality control aspects. Journal of Quality Technology, 10, 139-149.

Bloch, H. P. & Geitner, F.K. (1994). An Introduction to Machinery Reliability Assessment, Houston: Gulf Publishing Company.

Box, G. & Jenkins, G.M. (1976). Time Series Analysis: forecasting and control (Revised Edition), San Francisco: Holden-Day.

Chen, H. & Cheng, Y. (2007). Non-normality effects on the economic-statistical design of charts with Weibull in-control time. European Journal of Operational Research, 176(2), 986-998.

Durbin, J., & Watson, G.S. (1950). Testing for serial correlation in least squares regression I. Biometrika, 37, 409-428.

Durbin, J., & G.S. Watson (1951). Testing for serial correlation in least squares regression II. Biometrika, 38, 159-179.

English, J.R., Krishnamurthi, M. & Sastri, T. (1991). Quality monitoring of continuous flow processes, Computers and Industrial Engineering, 20(2), 251-260.

English, J. R., Lee, S. C., Martin, T.W. & Tilmon, C. (2000). Detecting changes in autoregressive processes with X and EWMA charts. IIE Transactions, 32, 1103-1113.

Ermer, D. S., Chow, M. C. & Wu, S. M. (1979). A time-series control chart for a nuclear reactor, Proceedings of the 1979 Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (pp. 92-98). Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers, New York.

Erto, P., Pallotta, G., & Park, S. (2008). An example of data technology product: a control chart for Weibull processes. International Statistical Review, 76(2). 157-166.

Harris, T. J. & Ross, W. H. (1991). Statistical process control procedures for correlated observations. The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 69, 48-57.

Jarrett, J. & Pan, X. (2007). The quality control chart for monitoring multivariate autocorrelated processes. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 51(8), 3862-3870.

Law, A. & Kelton, D. W. (1999). Simulation Modeling and Analysis (3rd Edition). McGraw-Hill Publishing Company.

Lu, C. W. & Reynolds, M. R. (1999). EWMA control charts for monitoring the mean of autocorrelated processes. Journal of Quality Technology, 31(2), 166-188.

MacGregor, J. F. & Harris, T. J. (1990). Discussion of EWMA control schemes: properties and enhancements. Technometrics, 32, 13-16.

Maragah, H. D. & Woodall, W. H. (1992). The effect of autocorrelation on the retrospective x-chart. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 40, 29-42.

Marazzi, A. & Yohai, V. J. (2006). Robust Box-Cox transformations based on minimum residual autocorrelation. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 50(10), 2752-2768.

Michelson, D. K (1994). Statistical process control for correlated data, Ph.D. dissertation. College Station, TX: Texas A&M University.

Montgomery, D. C. & Friedman, D. J. (1989). Statistical process control in a computer-integrated manufacturing environment. in Statistical Process Control in Automated Manufacturing, New York: Marcel Dekker.

Pindyck, R. S. & Rubinfeld, D. L. (2000). Econometric Models & Economic Forecasts (4th Edition). McGraw-Hill Publishing Company.

Ramjee, R. (2000). Quality control charts and persistent processes, Ph.D. dissertation. Hoboken, NJ: Stevens Institute of Technology.

Schmid, W. & Schone, A. (1997). Some properties of the EWMA control chart in the presence of autocorrelation. The Annals of Statistics, 25, 1277-1283.

Tseng, S. & Adams, B. (1994). Monitoring autocorrelated processes with an exponentially weighted moving average forecast. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 50, 187-195.

Vasilopoulos, A.V. & Stamboulis, A. P. (1978). Modification of control chart limits in the presence of data correlation. Journal of Quality Technology, 10(1), 20-30.

Wardell, D.G., Moskowitz, H. & Plante, R.D. (1992). Control charts in the presence of data correlation. Management Science, 38(8), 1084-1105.

Wieringa, J. E. (1999). Statistical process control for serially correlated data, Ph.D. dissertation. Groningen, Netherlands: University of Groningen.

Woodall, W. H. & Faltin, F. W. (1993). Autocorrelated data and SPC. ASQC Statistics Division Newsletter, 13(4), 18-21.