Selection of material for a specific engineering component, which plays a significant role in its design and proper functioning, is often treated as a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) problem where the most suitable material is to be chosen based on a given set of conflicting criteria. For solving these MCDM problems, the designers do not generally know what should be the optimal number of criteria required for arriving at the best decisive action. Those criteria should be independent to each other and their number should usually limit to seven plus or minus two. In this paper, five material selection problems are solved using three common MCDM techniques to demonstrate the effect of number of criteria on the final rankings of the material alternatives. It is interesting to observe that the choices of the best suited materials solely depend on the criterion having the maximum priority value. It is also found that among the three MCDM methods, the ranking performance of VIKOR (Vlse Kriterijumska Optimizacija Kompromisno Resenje) method is the best.

Chakraborty, S & India, P. (2013). Selection of materials using multi-criteria decision-making methods with minimum data.Decision Science Letters, 2(3), 135-148.

Athawale, V.M., & Chakraborty, S. (2012). Material selection using multi-criteria decision-making methods: A comparative study, Proc. of Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part L, Journal of Materials: Design and Applications, 226, 267-286.

Bahraminasab, M., & Jahan, A. (2011). Material selection for femoral component of total knee replacement using comprehensive VIKOR. Materials & Design, 32, 4471-4477.

Çalışkan, H., Kurşuncu, B., Kurbanoğlu, C., & Güven, S.Y. (2013). Material selection for the tool holder working under hard milling conditions using different multi criteria decision making methods. Materials & Design, 45, 473-479.

Cavallini, C., Giorgetti, A., Citti, P., & Nicolaie, F. (2013). Integral aided method for material selection based on quality function deployment and comprehensive VIKOR algorithm. Materials & Design, 47, 27-34.

Chatterjee, P., Athawale, V.M., & Chakraborty, S. (2009). Selection of materials using compromise ranking and outranking methods. Materials & Design, 30, 4043-4053.

Chatterjee, P., Athawale, V.M., & Chakraborty, S. (2011). Materials selection using complex proportional assessment and evaluation of mixed data methods. Materials & Design, 32, 851-860.

Chatterjee, P., & Chakraborty, S. (2012). Material selection using preferential ranking methods. Materials & Design, 35, 384-393.

Chauhan, A., & Vaish, R. (2012). Magnetic material selection using multiple attribute decision making approach. Materials & Design, 36, 1-5.

Edwards, K.L. (2005). Selecting materials for optimum use in engineering components. Materials & Design, 26, 469-473.

Fayazbakhsh, K., Abedian, A., Manshadi, B.D., & Khabbaz, R.S. (2009). Introducing a novel method for materials selection in mechanical design using Z-transformation in statistics for normalization of material properties. Materials & Design, 30, 4396-4404.

Findik, F., & Turan, K. (2012). Materials selection for lighter wagon design with a weighted property index method. Materials & Design, 37, 470-477.

Girubha, R.J., & Vinodh, S. (2012). Application of fuzzy VIKOR and environmental impact analysis for material selection of an automotive component. Materials & Design, 37, 478-486.

Jahan, A., Ismail, M.Y., Sapuan, S.M., & Mustapha, F. (2010). Material screening and choosing methods - A review. Materials & Design, 31, 696-705.

Jahan, A., Mustapha, F., Ismail, M.Y., Sapuan, S.M., & Bahraminasab, M. (2011). A comprehensive VIKOR method for material selection. Materials & Design, 32, 1215-1221.

Jahan, A., Bahraminasab, M., & Edwards, K.L. (2012). A target-based normalization technique for materials selection. Materials & Design, 35, 647-654.

Jee, D-H., & Kang K-J. (2000). A method for optimal material selection aided with decision making theory. Materials & Design, 21, 199-206.

Jiao, Q., Lan, Y., Guan, Z., & Li, Z. (2011). A new material selection approach using PROMETHEE method. Proc. of International Conference Electronic & Mechanical Engineering and Information Technology, 2950-2954.Karande, P., Gauri, S.K., & Chakraborty, S. (2013). Applications of utility concept and desirability function for materials selection. Materials & Design, 45, 349-358.

Manshadi, B.D., Mahmudi, H., Abedian, A., & Mahmudi, R. (2007). A novel method for materials selection in mechanical design: Combination of non-linear linearization and a modified digital logic method. Materials & Design, 28: 8-15.

Milani, A.S., Shanian, A., Madoliat, R., & Neme, J.A. (2005). The effect of normalization norms in multiple attribute decision making models: A case study in gear material selection. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 29, 312-318.

Miller, G.A. (1965). The magic number seven plus or minus two. Psychological Review, 63, 81-97.

Olson, D.L. (1996). Decision Aids for Selection Problems. New York: Springer.

Peng, A-H., & Xiao, X-M. (2013). Material selection using PROMETHEE combined with analytic network process under hybrid environment. Materials & Design, 47, 643-652.

Rao, R.V. (2008). A decision making methodology for material selection using an improved compromise ranking method. Materials & Design, 29, 1949-1954.

Rao, R.V., & Davim, J.P. (2008). A decision-making framework model for material selection using a combined multiple attribute decision-making method. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 35, 751-760.

Rao, R.V., & Patel, B.K. (2010). A subjective and objective integrated multiple attribute decision making method for material selection. Materials & Design, 31, 4738-4747.

Rathod, M.K., & Kanzaria, H.V. (2011). A methodological concept for phase change material selection based on multiple criteria decision analysis with and without fuzzy environment. Materials & Design, 32, 3578-3585.

Shanian, A., & Savadogo, O. (2006). TOPSIS multiple-criteria decision support analysis for material selection of metallic bipolar plates for polymer electrolyte fuel cell. Journal of Power Sources, 159: 1095-1104.

Shanian, A., & Savadogo, O. (2006). A material selection model based on the concept of multiple attribute decision making. Materials & Design, 27, 329-337.

Shanian, A., & Savadogo, O. (2006). A non-compensatory compromised solution for material selection of bipolar plates for polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) using ELECTRE IV. Electrochimica Acta, 51, 5307-5315.

Thakker, A., Jarvis, J., Buggy, M., & Sahed, A. (2008). A novel approach to materials selection strategy case study: Wave energy extraction impulse turbine blade. Materials & Design, 29, 1973-1980.

Yurdakul, M., & İç, Y.T. (2009). Application of correlation test to criteria selection for multi criteria decision making (MCDM) models. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 40, 403-412.