Leagile supply chain management has emerged as a proactive approach for improving business value of companies. The companies that face volatile and unpredictable market demand of their products must pioneer in leagile supply chain strategy for competition and various demands of customers. There are literally many approaches for performance metrics of supply chain in general, yet little investigation has identified the reliability and validity of such approaches particularly in leagile supply chains. This study examines the consistency approaches by confirmatory factor analysis that determines the adoption of performance dimensions. The prioritization of performance enablers under these dimensions of leagile supply chain in small and medium enterprises are determined through fuzzy logarithmic least square method (LLSM). The study developed a generic hierarchy model for decision-makers who can prioritize the supply chain metrics under performance dimensions of leagile supply chain.

Ramana, D., Rao, K & Kumar, J. (2013). Evaluation of performance metrics of leagile supply chain through fuzzy MCDM.Decision Science Letters, 2(3), 211-222.

Agarwal, A., Shankar, R., & Tiwari, M. K. (2006). Modeling the metrics of lean, agile and leagile supply chain: An ANP-based approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 173(1), 211-225.

Agus, A., & Hassan, Z. F. (2008). The strategic supplier partnership in a supply chain management with quality and business performance. International Journal of Business and Management Science, 1(2), 129.Barua, A., Konana, P., Whinston, A. B., & Yin, F. (2004). An empirical investigation of net-enabled business value. MIS Quarterly, 28(4), 585-620.

Bhatnagar, R., & Sohal, A. S. (2005). Supply chain competitiveness: measuring the impact of location factors, uncertainty and manufacturing practices.Technovation, 25(5), 443-456.

Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research. Guilford Press, New York.

Carter, S. A., & Wu, K. D. (2010). Symptoms of specific and generalized social phobia: an examination of discriminant validity and structural relations with mood and anxiety symptoms. Behavior therapy, 41(2), 254-265.Chen, C. Y., Leu, J. D., & Chiou, C. H. (2006). The Impact of E-Supply Chain Capability on Competitive Advantage and Organizational Performance.International Journal of Electronic Business Management, 4, 419-427.

Gunasekaran, A., Patel, C., & McGaughey, R. E. (2004). A framework for supply chain performance measurement. International journal of production economics, 87(3), 333-347.Hau, L., & Margurita, M. S. (1995). Product universality and design for supply chain management. Production Planning & Control, 6(3), 270-277.

Hu, L. & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff riteria for it indices in ovariance structure nalysis: Conventional riteria versus new lternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55.

Hsu. C. W., & Hu, A. H. (2008), Green supply chain management in the electronic industry, International Journal of Environmental science and Technology, 5(2), 205-216.

Li, S., Rao, S. S., Ragu-Nathan, T. S., & Ragu-Nathan, B. (2005). Development and validation of a measurement instrument for studying supply chain management practices. Journal of Operations Management, 23(6), 618-641.

Li, S., Ragu-Nathan, B., Ragu-Nathan, T. S., & Subba Rao, S. (2006). The impact of supply chain management practices on competitive advantage and organizational performance. Omega, 34(2), 107-124.

Lippman, S. (2001). Supply chain environmental management. Environmental Quality Management, 11(2), 11-14.

Mikhailov, L. (2003). Deriving priorities from fuzzy pair wise comparison judgments, Fuzzy Sets and systems, 134(3), 365-385.Motade, M., Toloie-Eshlaghy, A., & Halvachi-Zadeh, D. (2011). Assessment of supply hain gility in the utomotive industry of Tehran. European Journal of Scientific Research, 61(2), 210-229.

Narasimhan, R., Swink, M., & Kim, S. W. (2006). Disentangling leanness and agility: an empirical investigation. Journal of operations management, 24(5), 440-457.Özkir, V., & Demirel, T. (2011). A comprehensive analysis for the metrics of supply Chain design strategies, 15th International Research/Expert Conference “Trends in the Development of Machinery and Associated Technology” TMT 2011, Prague, Czech Republic, 353-356.

Swafford, P. M., Ghosh, S., & Murthy, N. (2006). The antecedents of supply chain agility of a firm: scale development and model testing. Journal of Operations Management, 24(2), 170-188.

Slack, N. (1987). The flexibility of manufacturing systems. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 7(4), 35-45.

Sower, V. E., & Abshire, R. D. (2011). Radio frequency identification technology utilatation and Organizational Agiliy. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 24-33.

Samaranayake, P. (2005). A conceptual framework for supply chain management: a structural integration. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 10(1), 47-59.

Slack, N., Chambers, S., Johnston, R., & Betts, A. (2008). Gerenciamento de operações e de processos. Bookman.Van Hoek, R. I., Harrison, A., & Christopher, M. (2001). Measuring agile capabilities in the supply chain. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 21(1/2), 126-148.

Vickery, S. K., Droge, C., & Markland, R. E. (2007). Production competence and business strategy: do they affect business performance?. Decision Sciences, 24(2), 435-456.

Wang, Y. M. (2006). On lexicographic goal programming method for generating weights from inconsistent interval comparison matrices. Applied mathematics and computation, 173(2), 985-991.Zelbst, P. J., Green Jr, K. W., Abshire, R. D., & Sower, V. E. (2010). Relationships among market orientation, JIT, TQM, and agility. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 110(5), 637-658.